Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision on the Supreme Court within the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking during the present case. In these kinds of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
Even though the punishment may be severe, its purpose just isn't solely to seek vengeance but to discourage probable offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment around the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that when the crime of murder was recognized, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for thinking of mitigating factors during sentencing.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal and traffic case information during the general district courts for the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
Now it is nicely-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different, therefore, in our view the figured out Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner from the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified from the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice for your loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment around the offender, making sure They may be held accountable for their actions.
The Court thought of the case to get maintainable under Article 184 (three) since the danger and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
Accessing free case regulation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and any person seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable labor law cases which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may possibly find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent could not be proved unless case is tried using(Bail Matters)
Здесь представлены рекомендации и описания способов лечения данным заболеванием.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.